On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, BRM wrote: > [...] > > The big point here, is let the community and its usage of QML/JS drive > the requirement for it being in QtCore.
All very well said in my opinion. And let me add another point that just crossed my mind and is meant to support both points of view: A bit of decoupling would bring additional flexibility for both QML and JavaScript users (not even speaking of other languages here...). What if a generation of QML is considered worthwile soon? Easier to be done in a new, seperate library. Same with a JS engine. Looking at how many Qt has been featuring during the last years once cannot help but being hesitant about sticking to a particular one too closely. Unlike QObject and friends both technologies are *very* much in a flux right now. Harri. _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
