> I do not like any solution involving generated headers at all.

> The reason is simple: Generated headers are simply not something I can see
> us adding to library code. The current headers are nice and relatively
> clean.

> If we add generated headers, we make deployment of libraries to 3rd
> parties a lot harder. In addition, there's a chance you might get very
> strange things showing up in your code completion in Creator or any other
> IDE.

In principle no problems that can't be solved.

> I believe that both the old syntax (runtime connect's) and the new one
> where connect's are done at compile time have it's valid uses. So I do
> like adding compile time connect's to Qt.

Compile time connects are definitely an improvement!

> To be able to add this, we'll need to do some compromises. public signals
> is IMO far less of a compromise than generated headers.

OK, maybe too much trouble for protected signals.

Peter
-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback

Reply via email to