-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:38:38 +0200 > Von: Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Qt5-feedback] QObject: new signals-slots syntax
> On Saturday, 24 de September de 2011 20:23:35 Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > > > > Definitely no boilerplate code. > > > > > > > > I only see a chance with generated headers, or does 'boilerplate > code' > > > > mean only hand written code? > > > > > > Boilerplate means stuff you have to write to get things up and > running. > > > > OK, despite all the other points you mentioned I attach here a file > which > > demonstrates the idea I'm talking about. In principle it only "frees" > > the signal and forwards the call to QObject::connect, which is already > > implemented by Oliver, so I assume it supports all features of Oliver's > > code. No boilerplate code to write, only the 'new and ugly' connect > > call. > > The same technique can be used to bypass the signal protection and emit > the > signal. > > So I'm skeptical about the advantage and still afraid of the drawbacks. OK, thread closed. Peter -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
