On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:46:43 AM you wrote: > I can follow the argumentation for using the scene graph instead of > QWidget because of technical limitations. But introducing QML instead of C > ++ is a completely unrelated decision and it's not valid to argue for QML > because of the scene graph - like it is not valid to argue for QWidget > because of C++. > The question what programming language is "more suitable" is a matter of > taste to a certain degree. Developers who are used to work with Qt/C++ > will hate to learn/use something else ( read Olivers comments ) - others > might love it, because they hope not having to invest in learning about C+ > + or software development at all. I think Uwe got just exactly the point.
QML is welcome from my point of view as long as it is easy and naturally usable with C++. I'm investing some time doing a small app with QML and coding with C++, so I'll put my feedback by then. _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
