On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 10 October 2011 11:52:37 Mark wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Some time ago I've read something here about replacing Qt't QRegExp backend >> with a existing library to get rid of the maintenance burden. > > > One other conclusion was not to touch QRegExp, meaning keeping compatibility. > And those that need powerfull regexp can use the library and syntax they want. > (Notice that in C++11, there is std::regex) >
Wouldn't this prevent a nicer tight integration with other Qt classes like QString, QVariant etc? That is to say it would be nice if we could use a more powerful regexp with these classes. Girish _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
