On Wednesday, 12 de October de 2011 17:17:43 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > You want do depend only on QtCore? Fine: you no lookbehind for you, some > cases will be very slow. On the plus side: no dependency on V8, no UTF-16 to > UTF-8 conversion, etc
I don't want a class in QtCore that can be qualified as "meh".
Either it's good and people should use it for the vast majority of use-cases
where that technology is applicable, or it has no business being in QtCore.
QtCore is used in 100% of Qt applications (by definition).
And it needs a maintainer.
The only reason to keep it as-is right now is to keep the Qt 4 source
compatibility.
PS: if you find other classes that are "meh" in QtCore, speak up. We need to
see how to improve it and what the impact is. Post in new threads, please.
PPS: QSettings is also "meh" but I've already posted about it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
