On Monday 10 October 2011, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Monday 10 October 2011 11:52:37 Mark wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago I've read something here about replacing Qt't QRegExp > > backend with a existing library to get rid of the maintenance burden. > > One other conclusion was not to touch QRegExp, meaning keeping > compatibility. And those that need powerfull regexp can use the library > and syntax they want. (Notice that in C++11, there is std::regex)
This sounds like a good plan to me. For all my purposes Qt regexps were powerful and fast enough, and they were maybe not high-end, but definitely not trivial anymore. IMO they are good enough as they are, especially keeping the (close to) 100% source compatiblity promise in mind. Alex _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
