On 10/15/11 8:40 PM, "ext Sylvain Pointeau" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Either way: RE2 [2] has no lookhead/lookbehind assertions, which was >> one of the issues "to be solved" [3] by a proposed engine (and to be >> honest even QRegExp in Qt4 supports lookaheads, and I don't see any >> reason to *drop* features instead of gaining new ones). > > >+1 > >I'd also trade compatibility for speed. I have a LaTeX logfile parser >which uses look(?:ahead|behind) assertions excessively. > >PCRE is probably then the only option! Yes, sounds almost like it. The good thing about it is that it also has a JS compatible mode that we can then offer for people that would like to have compatible syntax between C++ and QML. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
