On Saturday, 22 de October de 2011 11:29:38 [email protected] wrote: > With that out of the way, I've put the class definition up on pastebin for > comment. I've withheld the implementation until I've had a chance to clear > it with our legal people. In the meantime, I think the interface of the > class is probably enough to get some feedback on whether people think this > has the potential to be a viable candidate for a command line parser for > Qt: > > http://pastebin.com/45PiHzLA > > Note that the code currently does not adhere to the Qt coding guidelines (it > follows ours instead), but if we do end up contributing it to Qt, then it > should not be too difficult to bring it into line.
Hi Craig
It's not just the coding guideline, it's the architecture. I'm not a fan of
tool classes with virtuals...
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
