That kinda sucks..oh well..it was interesting doing it anyways.
The one difference however between our lists is that mine used words created by hooks.
QAT gets bumped way down when you include hooks.  So i guess whatever owl2 flavour your want, there is now both.


From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason E Katz-Brown
Sent: April 11, 2006 6:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [quackle] Re: Quackle VS. Quackle Stats

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 07:33 +0000, lauradoodleuk wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Evan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > That sounds right up your street!
>
>
> As I said to Craig about something else recently, I would probably
> find it easier to translate Milton into Japanese.  :)
>
> It would be great if someone with the relevant skills (and time to
> spare) could produce the SOWPODS equivalent though.
>
> However, given the impending introduction of Collins (eventually) it
> would probably make more sense to wait till then.
>
> Pete

Y'all realize olaugh's had these playability lists forever, right?

TWL2:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~o-laughl/march06playability

Sowpods:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~o-laughl/sowpods-playability/

Pete, I appreciate the comments, but a lot of your mails, like this one,
carry no value and restate your thoughts. Please send mails when you
have something novel to say.

thanks
Jason


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to