On 4/11/06, Ten Den, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > My more recent playability values won't match up completely with
> > Chris's because they are not simple counts of a word being played.
> > The approximate equity loss if the word is not known (the difference
> > between the best and second best play) is the bulk of the statistic.
>
> > John
>
> The last sentence confused me. I read it a dozen times...maybe i'm
> dumb...but I can't figure out what you mean.
Each time a word is played, I note the difference between it (its
equity) and the second best play. This will be high for QI if it is
your only Q play, and low or zero for something like ERASION when it
is one of many equally good bingos.
John
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/quackle/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
