> >I actually prefer having to use the Shift to type in a blank letter. I >did notice that the letter used was in your rack, Quackle must not have >registered that you had already "placed" it on the board. Even if >Quackle worked the way you wanted it to, you would still need to have >some way to indicate to use the blank for the first occurrence of a >letter and the actual letter for the second. Requiring you to use Shift >alleviates that problem.
I understand the human end of the equation, but a smart program would take the letters typed not on the rack and assume them to be blanks, and it has behaved like this in the past and (sometimes) now.
