Dead wrong,
I'm for Bush and a Vet who served during Nam. I'm on SSI so you know
that means I don't have extra cash lying around. Kerry WILL NOT be
putting any money in your pocket. He is for higher taxes. He has more
money than Bush. And has slung more mud than Bush.
Iraq was a dangerous threat and France screwed us out of Full UN
support. We liberated Afganistan almost decimating the Taliban while
eliminating a lot of Al Queda and have bin hidden in a cave somewhere.
Usay or Uday was friendly with al Queda and they had a training camp in
Iraq. Sadamned has been sending money to terrorists for decades trying
to kill Israelies. Krazy Gadafi saw what happened to Sadamned and gave
up his WMD program (which included Iraqi nuke scientists) and shut down
all links to Terrorists. While no "significant number" of WMD's have
been found YET, there have been some found.
The Democrats use meatheads like moore to spread lies and propaganda,
but the momment the Swiftboat Captains questioned Kerrys claims they
screamed bloody murder.
So don't believe the propaganda that Bush is only representing the rich.
Families with children got more of their own money still in their
pocket. Small businesses had the biggest volume of growth, most are
owned by people taxed like an individual, and Bush created special
incentives for their investing in new equipment and hiring people.
Don't believe the propaganda that Sadamned didn't pose a significant
threat. His hero was Stalin. He wanted to be the ruler of the Arab
Nations and thought he could acieve it by destroying Israel.
We were declared war upon decades ago.
9/11 finally woke most people up to it.
The world changed forever for Americans.
Twerrorists will see any sign of wanting to negotiate as weakness that
they will exploit.
They don't want to negotiate.
They want to kill us.
So the question comes down to how far will we go to destroy them first?
Kerry has stated he will wager a more "sensitive" war on Terror.
He is living in the 60's.
And don't believe the propaganda that the tax cuts only benefited the
rich.
http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/taxes.htm
>
> I agree QP, but we all live w/threats on a daily basis. How to deal
w/threats is the question. Was Saddam a threat, "yes", was he the
reason for 911, "no", was 911 the reason for us going into Iraq,
depends on who you ask. The bottom line is al-Qaida was responsible for
911, so we went to Iraq?.... what did they think Saddam would have
weapons of mass destruction, "and Osama", come on. So many countries
are a threat to the world community, should we jump into every country
that poses a threat. If so, we better have more global support. Today,
our leadership has walked away from more than a century of American
leadership in the world to embrace a new, and dangerously ineffective,
American disregard for the world. They bully instead of persuade. They
act alone when they could assemble a team. They confuse leadership with
going it alone. They fail to understand that real leadership means
standing by your principles and rallying others to join you. The only
way for the U.S. to r!
> egain
> respect in the world community is to change presidents. I am not
anti-Bush nor am I pro-Kerry, a politician is a politician, most will
screw you for they're own gain. I vote for who (I HOPE) will benefit me
the most. And I would just about bet that most people on this list who
are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political
wrangling just got my 2 cents worth.
> Tim
> www.geocities.com/onemofortom
>
>
>
> QuadPirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-0000000000003.0;You know I hate that our
soldiers fighting this war and losing their lives but I hardly think
that Iraq wasn't a threat.
> In 1993 Sadam tried to take former President Bush with a car bomb in
Kuwait and President Clinton sent a couple cruise missiles into Iraqi
intelligence headquarters.
> Sadam repeatedly kicked out UN inspectors and used the oil for food
money like an ATM machine.
> All he had to do was show them how he destroyed his biological
weapons and refused to.
> Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's
no threat.
>
> Mark
