|
I have a question.
If President Bush's position on Stem Cells is based on the fact that he thinks an embryo is life then why is it ok for the donor to decide if it's destroyed or given to research or adopted by another clinic.
It seems to me if an embryo is life then the parents of the embryo should be held accountable for destroying it in the first place.
This is why I have a problem with this position on embryonic stem cell research.
Why is it ok for the donor to decide this isn't life but not researchers are we saying that ordinary people are smarter than our best scientist?
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:06:34 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to: Communist Party Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
I think that would be false logic, if I'm understanding it correctly. Your question is based on the assumption that they stay frozen forever and never used for IVF at a future time.
Since you bring up "live a quality life", are you saying an embryo is life? If so then what gives you the right to determine it's fate?
At 06:38 PM 10/11/2004, Stacy Harim wrote:
So they stay frozen forever and never live a quality life?
Stacy
| 
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
