I pretty much stay away from the tv, too. And sorry for reacting to your post as if you were a spectator. You can tell the difference between the people who are getting all their info from the boob tube (and accept it readily) and it sucks to try to have a conversation with those people.
Sorry I didn't get your post at first, I'm just sick of people saying "let's wait to see what really happened" with the response, when we know a lot!
On 9/8/05, Lori Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We don't watch the media at all. It becomes nauseating. Not just abt Katrina but on anything.Reporters act as though their viewing audience are idgits. While there ARE many idgets who can't thinkfor themselves ... there are those who DO NOT NEED the new INTERPRETED BY the media. Andthat is what "reporting the news" has come down to anymore. Reporters think people are toostupid to understand facts so they HAVE TO interpret the news for us.This is especially true at election times but the tactic is grossly used on most anything.We have a huge 70-inch TV and hardly ever watch it! We're into reading here ... and notthe newspaper.If people are glued to the tv and Katrina so much and feel adamant abt helping .... sacrifice yourcable tv for a few months and send that money to the Red Cross.Lori MichaelsonC4/5 complete quad, 25 years postTucson, AZ-------Original Message-------From: ~LittleQuad~Date: 09/08/05 12:13:18To: Quad-list postSubject: Re: [QUAD-L] Katrina timelinehear, hear! i told mom, wish they'd report local news......im sorry but people can only take so much... we have several thousand evacuees here in tyler....
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:What difference does it make ? they are going to appoint an investigation team. Who needs updates.......it's on all of our news day and night and will be for a very long time to come.
--
Life is 440 horsepower in a 2-cylinder engine.
-Henry Miller

