Re: [QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article: Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist master...

[DeLiMiTeD4]

The 1st gulf war caused all the ensueing problems. Why did we go there? We were mercenairies for the Saudis and kuwaitis. We even made a profit on the 1st gulf war? Why wasn't that profit shared with the troops that fought? Because it was wrong! The Bush family has a strange way of picking friends and destroying friendships. Sure wish they had some love for all the American families they have harmed. Stop living in the past and start paying attention to the truth. Saudis and kuwaitis hate our guts. With careful foriegn policy, so does most of the world!   john   In a message dated 6/9/2006 12:23:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: An article from 2004? Stop living in the past. Do you want to dig up every article that talks about what if the Clinton administration had attacked Osama bin Laden when it had a chance then all the thousands of deaths that happened since could have been avoided. Sept 11, 2001 would not have happened if the Clinton administration had acted after the first WTC attack, the USS Cole attack, the US embassies attacked. At 06:14 PM 6/8/2006, River Wolfe wrote: Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist mastermind The Bush administration had several chances to attack and destroy a  suspected terrorist operation with ties to al-Qaida but never pulled  the trigger._ NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/from/ET/