----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:38
AM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article:
Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist master...
Strange thing Freedom....
Once one gets a taste, it's more addictive to one's soul than drugs.....
to those who didn't grow up in it through the selfless sacrifices of their
ancestors.... Peolpe forget how many years we stayed in Germany and
Japan, and we're STILL in S. Korea.
But we now here BS about "quagmire", calling sophmoric degradidations
torture, claiming we're worse than the beheaders and real torturers and
comparisons to Vietnam, while all the positive news is ignored, like "women
voting and holding office in an Arab country (that's 2 now).
We gave into liberal propaganda (speaking of the majority of public
support) during Vietnam, {1] when the "Useful Idiots" like hanoi jane and
komrade kerry decieved America, we created "no fire zones etc, which
eliminated any chance of victory and signed a cease fire agreement.
When the North Vietnamese violated the Cease fire Agreement, the
Democratic leadership faulted on our promise and over a million civilians were
slaughtered in Vietnam and Cambodia as the "Peacful Communists" (according to
the "Useful Idiots") took them over.
A new generation, unaware of the
truth that the "Useful Idiots" caused, are now bombarded by the same style
propaganda, and bin hidden is counting on them just like Ho Chi Mein
did.
[1] This was not the only problem, as then, like now, "politicians"
thought they were better qualified to run the war.
The TERRORISTS (I refuse to call foriegn suicide bombers "insurgents")
are fighting to PREVENT stability and hope to start civil war, BUT THE IRAQI's
ARE NOW TELLING US WHO THEY ARE and where they're hiding.
The only hope we have of a long term solution is proving the Terrorists
wrong by exposing the people to the truth.
Presently the "Hate Bush " first crowd is muddying that water of hope by
aiding with propaganda that America is Bad and blowing things out of
proportion instead of waiting for the truth to come out.
I met a new para a couple of weeks ago at the Hines VA SCI unit, who was
sorry he couldn't go back to fight in Iraq.
Doesn't sound like a bad guy to me. But it does make this an SCI
topic.
Stunt
On 6/15/06, RollinOn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
|
It's going to be real interesting to see how they use
their Freedom, I just hope we're not building the
largest Terrorist Army in the Middle East.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: 06/15/06
16:50:59
Subject: Re:
[QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article: Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist
master...
According to the History channel, that was a 'pay-back' to Russia
for supporting the commies in Viet Nam. I love seeing how all
this intertwined crap eventually comes back to bite one on his flap
surgery spot. I sure hope the Iraqis use their new freedom and
power to smite their fellow towel-heads instead of turning on
us. Possibly if Isreal would help the Iraqis, they could protect
their own future a bit too. Who knows?
Dave
In a message dated 6/15/2006 2:09:01 P.M. US Mountain Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
Think about this for a second, we are now helping a country
build an army that we might very well be fighting in the
future.
Real Smart thinking!
Don't forget we helped Osama defeat the Soviet Union.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date:
06/15/06 13:50:01
Subject: Re:
[QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article: Avoiding attacking suspected
terrorist master...
Exactly Dave!
Killing any of them is not going to change the fact that we
are dealing with people that ultimately want infidels dead
and off their holy land. I see that many people think
we Americans are trying to help the iraqi people, but ultimatly,
we are sending our soldiers to die and be mutilated. When I see
American politicians talking about agreements with Saudis,
Kuwaitis, Egyptians, iraqis and Jordanians, I get a sinking
feeling in my heart.
These people want our money so they can kill us for having
troops in their holy lands. It doesn't matter if we had the most
noble reason for going their. We shouldn't go their! The
Israelis will never find peace there, only periods when the
killing subsides.
I'm all for having a special part of the
CIA and special forces to deal with wahabbists that
are planning and plotting against the US. If we had
done nothing when Saddam grabbed Kuwait, he would have been
stuck the arab world and the wahabbists against him. We would be
having gas wars again so the Saudis and Iraq could finance their
paranoia. Saddam would have most likely been asasinated by now
and his idiot sons would be trying another war against Iran. We
could have been sitting in the easy seat pulling strings and
wahabbist palestinians would be blowing themselves up
in Tehran and Bagdad. The twin towers would still be
standing and our soldiers would still be alive.
I'm so tired of people that think this is a
liberral/conservative issue.
Stunt, you mentioned a "pact" between FDR and the king of
Saudi Arabia in 44. FDR promised not to back a jewish homeland
in palestine if the Saudi's wouldn't nationalize the Aramco
wells.
john
In a message dated 6/13/2006 5:49:34 PM Eastern Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Stunt,
Everyone should Google 'Wahhabi' and read
about what the enemy is teaching in the Mosques and schools
in the Islamic World.
With
Love,
CtrlAltDel
aka Dave
C4/5 Complete - 30 Years Post
Texas,
USA
How many Americans know that FDR was the
one who made the pact with
the Royal Saudi family? Every
President since has honored it.
Forget the
PROPAGANDA!
This new round was designed to undermine the
victory of taking out
Zarquwi, nothing more. The so called
"Progressive Liberal" media hates
President Bush so much,
that they "feel" compelled to dig up old BS
just to try to
take away from the taking out of a brutal butcher who
was
doing everything he could to try to start a civil war.
We
"Gave Peace a chance", and 9/11 was our reward.
WAKE
UP!
Stunt
On 6/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
> The 1st gulf war caused all the
ensueing problems. Why did we go there? We
> were
mercenairies for the Saudis and kuwaitis. We even made a profit
on the
> 1st gulf war? Why wasn't that profit shared with
the troops that fought?
> Because it was wrong! The Bush
family has a strange way of picking friends
> and
destroying friendships. Sure wish they had some love for all
the
> American families they have harmed. Stop living in
the past and start paying
> attention to the truth.
Saudis and kuwaitis hate our guts. With careful
> foriegn
policy, so does most of the world!
>
>
john
>
> In a message dated 6/9/2006 12:23:40 AM
Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> An article
from 2004? Stop living in the past. Do you want to dig up every
> article that talks about what if the Clinton
administration had attacked
> Osama bin Laden when it had
a chance then all the thousands of deaths that
> happened
since could have been avoided. Sept 11, 2001 would not have
> happened if the Clinton administration had acted after
the first WTC attack,
> the USS Cole attack, the US
embassies attacked.
>
> At 06:14 PM 6/8/2006, River
Wolfe wrote:
> Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist
mastermind
> The Bush administration had several chances
to attack and destroy a
> suspected terrorist operation
with ties to al-Qaida but never pulled
> the trigger._
NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/from/ET/
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
