Re: [QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article: Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist master...

[Oconnelldb]

According to the History channel, that was a 'pay-back' to Russia for supporting the commies in Viet Nam.  I love seeing how all this intertwined crap eventually comes back to bite one on his flap surgery spot.  I sure hope the Iraqis use their new freedom and power to smite their fellow towel-heads instead of turning on us.  Possibly if Isreal would help the Iraqis, they could protect their own future a bit too.  Who knows? Dave       In a message dated 6/15/2006 2:09:01 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Think about this for a second, we are now helping a country build an army that we might very well be fighting in the future. Real Smart thinking! Don't forget we helped Osama defeat the Soviet Union.     Mark      -------Original Message-------   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 06/15/06 13:50:01 To: quad-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] MSNBC.com Article: Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist master...   Exactly Dave! Killing any of them is not going to change the fact that we are dealing with people that ultimately want infidels dead and off their holy land. I see that many people think we Americans are trying to help the iraqi people, but ultimatly, we are sending our soldiers to die and be mutilated. When I see American politicians talking about agreements with Saudis, Kuwaitis, Egyptians, iraqis and Jordanians, I get a sinking feeling in my heart. These people want our money so they can kill us for having troops in their holy lands. It doesn't matter if we had the most noble reason for going their. We shouldn't go their! The Israelis will never find peace there, only periods when the killing subsides. I'm all for having a special part of the CIA and special forces to deal with wahabbists that are planning and plotting against the US. If we had done nothing when Saddam grabbed Kuwait, he would have been stuck the arab world and the wahabbists against him. We would be having gas wars again so the Saudis and Iraq could finance their paranoia. Saddam would have most likely been asasinated by now and his idiot sons would be trying another war against Iran. We could have been sitting in the easy seat pulling strings and wahabbist palestinians would be blowing themselves up in Tehran and Bagdad. The twin towers would still be standing and our soldiers would still be alive. I'm so tired of people that think this is a liberral/conservative issue. Stunt, you mentioned a "pact" between FDR and the king of Saudi Arabia in 44. FDR promised not to back a jewish homeland in palestine if the Saudi's wouldn't nationalize the Aramco wells.   john   In a message dated 6/13/2006 5:49:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Stunt,   Everyone should Google 'Wahhabi' and read about what the enemy is teaching in the Mosques and schools in the Islamic World.   With Love, CtrlAltDel aka Dave C4/5 Complete - 30 Years Post Texas, USA  Tim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How many Americans know that FDR was the one who made the pact with the Royal Saudi family? Every President since has honored it. Forget the PROPAGANDA! This new round was designed to undermine the victory of taking out Zarquwi, nothing more. The so called "Progressive Liberal" media hates President Bush so much, that they "feel" compelled to dig up old BS just to try to take away from the taking out of a brutal butcher who was doing everything he could to try to start a civil war. We "Gave Peace a chance", and 9/11 was our reward. WAKE UP! Stunt On 6/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > The 1st gulf war caused all the ensueing problems. Why did we go there? We > were mercenairies for the Saudis and kuwaitis. We even made a profit on the > 1st gulf war? Why wasn't that profit shared with the troops that fought? > Because it was wrong! The Bush family has a strange way of picking friends > and destroying friendships. Sure wish they had some love for all the > American families they have harmed. Stop living in the past and start paying > attention to the truth. Saudis and kuwaitis hate our guts. With careful > foriegn policy, so does most of the world! > > john > > In a message dated 6/9/2006 12:23:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > An article from 2004? Stop living in the past. Do you want to dig up every > article that talks about what if the Clinton administration had attacked > Osama bin Laden when it had a chance then all the thousands of deaths that > happened since could have been avoided. Sept 11, 2001 would not have > happened if the Clinton administration had acted after the first WTC attack, > the USS Cole attack, the US embassies attacked. > > At 06:14 PM 6/8/2006, River Wolfe wrote: > Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist mastermind > The Bush administration had several chances to attack and destroy a > suspected terrorist operation with ties to al-Qaida but never pulled > the trigger._ NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports. > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/from/ET/ >     Dave www.daveoconnell.com c3-inc-1967