Re: [QUAD-L] Stem Cell Bill Killed

[Bill_J]

Wheel can certainly speak for himself/herself.  I think there are people who (20 years from now) might come down with ALS or Parkinson's that would disagree.  The bill would not kill recent embryos for stem cell research.  It was proposing they use the embryos destined to be destroyed anyway to be used.   Bill age 55 C6 Incomplete since 7/20/68 Leesburg, FL For every action, there is an equal and opposite government program. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Lubin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; quad-list@eskimo.com ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:40 PM Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Stem Cell Bill Killed Care to explain that? Death is certain for everyone. Stem cells from human embryos may have the potential to make life better for some but they won't make anyone immortal. Seems to me if he had signed it then it would have meant he had chosen certain death for those embryos funded by the government. At 05:04 PM 7/19/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bush has once again demonstrated bad judgement.  He has chosen certain death for some Americans to have money saved for the destruction of another government.