During the vietnam war it became a habit to undercut vets healthcare so Washington could make the war seem like it was the fault of a bunch of privates that we were there at all. We didn't just mistreat the healthy vets from that war. I think most of us understand that reguardless of how we feel about the war, our soldiers are doing their duty and should expect our best efforts when that causes them a disability. I would like to see them get jobs in Washington DC where nobody gets off their butts anyway. Loss of memory seems to be a job requirement when doing paperwork, too. It's a shame we need a war to get a new batch of bureaucrats, but I've written to encourage hiring disabled vets instead of mentally challenged relatives. john -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 4:07 PM Subject: [QUAD-L] VA Hospitals
In a message dated 3/3/2007 3:04:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm late in reading this post, but just this week I read that Defense Secretary Gates has called the Army's treatment and care of its wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Medical Center as "unacceptable." The Army is taking this as a very serious matter and heads are already starting to roll. It is about time the military takes a serious look at their health care and makes some real changes. This information has been kept from the soldiers on the front lines too. Can you imagine the moral of any soldier going into combat knowing that the cheap contractor is providing those services too? W AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
