i'm a Mormon and maybe you shouldn't confuse religion with politics....

--- On Mon, 6/11/12, John S. <[email protected]> wrote:


From: John S. <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Obamacare
To: [email protected]
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, June 11, 2012, 7:07 PM





every year since I became a quad I've been answering dumbas* Q's. Obamacare 
doesn't even begin untll 2014. i'd rather pay a few dollars to cover my 
paperwork each year than consider medicare broke by 2020. The romney sh*t is 
going to tax ppl with insurance, forcing more to loose insurance and become a 
greater healthcare burden. Under Obama everyone with a job purchases insurance. 
No Q's like age, previous conditions, etc. those of us like me wont be affected 
at all. I was wiped out with my accident 36 years ago. I live on whats under 
the table, like 1/4 of the economy. The rich own the insurance companies and 
hate obama. Its ggood enough for me.
Think of it like this, a billionaire mormon bishop running the most powerfull 
country on earth. lol, i cant vote for that. 





From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:57 AM
Subject: [QUAD-L] Obamacare




Pray that Obamacare is overturned.  I'm already seeing new requirements 
when I go into the doctor office that scare me.
 
Have you ever had your doctor ask, "why are you on medicare"?
 

Glenn Henry

G.A.Henry Radio
100 Mill Street
Washington Boro, PA 17582 
 

In a message dated 5/1/2012 11:22:16 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

As much as I would like to have more accessibility to healthcare, the more I 
look at the financial implications of his plan, the more I feel like as a whole 
it will be more detrimental to the country than helpful. Forcing insurance 
companies to take people with pre-existing conditions, fines for companies and 
individuals who don't get coverage. Private insurance premiums will most 
certainly be raised for those that have it. How can expanding coverage to over 
30 million new people possibly lower costs?


27 billion of new taxes on drug companies, 20 billion on medical device makers. 
Those costs will just pass through to us in my opinion. 


Total of 18 new taxes estimating 503 billion in revenue.  New taxes may bring 
revenue but they will also (also my opinion) slow economic growth which we 
desperately need right now. 


I listened to the oral arguments on the Supreme Court website and it seemed the 
justices were pretty skeptical of the constitutionality of it. 


Cheers,


Todd
C/6

On May 1, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Bobbie Humphreys <[email protected]> wrote:





Obama's plan will be forever tweaked till the end of time.     Bobbie






Sent from my iPad

On May 1, 2012, at 6:20 PM, "Greg" <[email protected]> wrote:







I think we need just a national Medicare, with extra insurance for those who 
want, need, or who can afford more. Those who are so against it say they don’t 
was the government making decisions. But that means they would prefer an 
insurance company who is for profit, who gets bonuses for denying medical 
procedures, and who can cancel you after you get sick/injured. I still have not 
heard 1 good reason not to have national health care. This Obama thing is too 
confusing. 


Greg

 
-----------

It's enough to make even a quad kick ass and throw fists. But I am not 
surprised. The slightest medical problem results in bills for things and from 
people you never even heard of. To say that the whole thing is an immoral, 
unethical racket is an understatement. A lifetime of savings can be wiped out 
in one week. A simple hello from the doctor can cost $300. Your experience is 
all too common. I don't have a clue if Obama's plan will be better, but I 
certainly hope so.
=

Reply via email to