It's working here. Still recovering from Christmas. Getting ready for "Happy New Year "! John S.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: [email protected] </div><div>Date:12/30/2014 11:02 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] paralysis... an issue </div><div> </div>Just testing the system. Best Wishes In a message dated 12/30/2014 10:02:06 A.M. Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: TEST, TEST In a message dated 12/20/2014 5:25:02 P.M. Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: I agree with wheelchair about a major schism between paraplegics and quadriplegics. Paraplegics can and should pursue independent living. Quadriplegics will always be dependent, and hopefully we can pursue dependence with dignity. Press enter key press enter key From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 8:41 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] paralysis... an issue Its a theory. A very good theory, but just a theory. If such a schism exists, its between Paras and Quads. Or those who are mobile and those not mobile. Or perhaps, those who can communicate and those who can not communicate. Its all carried under the same umbrella. Best Wishes In a message dated 11/29/2014 3:48:06 A.M. Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: a quad, c3, incomplete. 15 years post here find a link .interesting.do you think there a schism developing in the paralysis community, as discussed in the link? thanks. http://www.spinalcordinjury-paralysis.org/blogs/20/2309
