The Q700 and Q900 were the first Quadras.  As such there may not be 
as many of them as later models hence fewer questions.  It's a 
perfectly good Quadra.  To me it's only determents are 30 pin SIMM 
RAM and lack of a CD-ROM bay.  While later Qs can have memory 
expanded beyond 68M that is probably enough for most situations. 
It's one of the slowest Quadras but not that much slower.

Personally I prefer OS 8.1 on Quadras.  I prefer to have the Finder 
UI as close my other Macs as possible, largely to protect against 
errant actions.

At 12:50 PM -0500 9/25/2002, Wade Rackley wrote:
>Greetings!
>
>I have been reading the Quadlist for a little while now, choosing to "lurk
>and learn" for a bit before posting here.
>
>I see little to no talk regarding the Quadra 700 thus far on this list.  Is
>this particular CPU just not popular here, or have I just not been lurking
>here for a long enough time?  I mean, is it considered to be a
>less-than-good choice of '040 CPUs?  I occasionally find references to
>various problems regarding the flashing question mark when booting.  But,
>other than that, it just seems to be less popular.  Why is that?  Is there
>something about my 700 that I am missing?
>
>So far, I have had a good bit of fun learning how to hod rod the hardware
>and optimize the software.  But am I missing some fatal flaw that would
>make me want to migrate to another '040?
>
>Here is my setup:
>
>Quadra 700/50 MHz Sonnet QuadDoubler, 68 MB RAM, 2 MB VRAM, 2 GB 7200 rpm
>Baracuda HD, with a 17" Apple Color Monitor, Apple 600e CD ROM Drive,
>OneScanner, Personal LaserWriter 320, all PAINSTAKINGLY painted flat black
>and dull-coted (looks great, too).  It is running 7.1 with a few add-ins
>from Gamba's site and a 7.5.5 System Folder.  I use Eudora 3.1.3 and iCab
>and older versions of my favorite applications.  This old thing, when
>running this setup, feels quite fast in the finder, is not bad on the WWW,
>and is really fun for me to use.
>
>So (again), what am I missing here?  Should I get a different Quadra and
>transfer my upgrades to it?  Is this a viable "only" system for me at home?
>I use a Lombard as my main machine, but the mother board is in the throes
>of a slow death.  I will then be left with this 700 "hobby" machine and my
>trusty SE/30 as my only web and productivity machines until I can save up
>the cash needed to buy a new Mac (which will be quite a while,
>unfortunately for me...)



-- 
Clark Martin
Redwood City, CA, USA
Macintosh / Internet Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway"

-- 
Quadlist is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Quadlist info:          <http://lowendmac.com/lists/quadlist.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/quadlist%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to