Paul Jakma <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Greg Troxel wrote: > >> I don't really care about this point - markdown seems ok. But it's >> not reasonable to depend on pandoc, because it's written in Haskell, >> and there are no portable implementations (*). If you aren't on a >> CPU/arch where there are bootstrap kits, it's too hard. So I think >> he decision should be made assuming unportable toolchain components >> do not exist. > > That's a fair point. > > Note, the dependency on pandoc wouldn't be for each user. Just a "if > ever we want to quickly go back, someone somewhere should be able to > run pandoc" dependency, and even then it can still be converted by > hand.
Agreed - to depend on one person being able to run it once somewhere, maybe, is fine. It just shouldn't be part of anything normal.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
