I am worried that with a 2 week wait we are going to have a hard time getting our patches in and will see a backlog build up again (assuming we can get the current backlog resolved). I looked and we had 40 commits the last two weeks of October. Granted that is high for us though, in the first two weeks of Nov we had 20.
So being conservative say we submit 40 patches a month....based on the explicit acks we've seen for the 60 Donald submitted ~10 days ago we are going to be waiting the 2 week period for most of those. That is a lot of waiting for everyone. Daniel On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > 3 days is not possible for implicit acceptance. Hell, even 2 weeks is a > bit short for me - I'd like to even sometimes be able to put an extension > on that at certain times. > > Otherwise we go with explicit acks from some minimum set of people - which > may take longer anyway (and now we're back to picking that set, and etc.). > > regards, > > Paul > > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Daniel Walton wrote: > > I will cast a vote for 3 business days. >> >> Daniel >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Donald Sharp < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I think I would prefer a shorter amount of time. 2 weeks without comment >>> is a durn long time. >>> >>> donald >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Donald Sharp wrote: >>>> >>>> What's the length of time for an implicit-ack? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Well, David had 2 weeks on it before. And the rounds before have tended >>>> to leave most patches soak in a publicly visible queue for 2+ weeks. So >>>> will we say 2 weeks min? >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> -- >>>> Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A >>>> Fortune: >>>> As you grow older, you will still do foolish things, but you will do >>>> them >>>> with much more enthusiasm. >>>> -- The Cowboy >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- > Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > Harris's Lament: > All the good ones are taken. >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
