3 days is too short for me to do actual testing. It might be ok for a
smaller amount of patches, but
for a large batch of like 60 patches I need more time.
I.e in the current case of the 60 patches form cumulus, I know at least
a few more errors and need some time
to narrow them down and give useful feedback.
- Martin
On 16 Nov 2015, at 13:49, Paul Jakma wrote:
3 days is not possible for implicit acceptance. Hell, even 2 weeks is
a bit short for me - I'd like to even sometimes be able to put an
extension on that at certain times.
Otherwise we go with explicit acks from some minimum set of people -
which may take longer anyway (and now we're back to picking that set,
and etc.).
regards,
Paul
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Daniel Walton wrote:
I will cast a vote for 3 business days.
Daniel
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Donald Sharp
<[email protected]>
wrote:
I think I would prefer a shorter amount of time. 2 weeks without
comment
is a durn long time.
donald
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Donald Sharp wrote:
What's the length of time for an implicit-ack?
Well, David had 2 weeks on it before. And the rounds before have
tended
to leave most patches soak in a publicly visible queue for 2+
weeks. So
will we say 2 weeks min?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
As you grow older, you will still do foolish things, but you will
do them
with much more enthusiasm.
-- The Cowboy
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Harris's Lament:
All the good ones are taken.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
