On 11/16/2015 11:54 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
I think I would prefer a shorter amount of time. 2 weeks without
comment is a durn long time.
I agree it is long, but is you make it too short you run the risk of not
giving people enough time to see the patch, especially in a holiday
season. The solution is to encourage people to do explicit acks, ans do
them as soon as possible.
--Jafar
donald
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Donald Sharp wrote:
What's the length of time for an implicit-ack?
Well, David had 2 weeks on it before. And the rounds before have
tended to leave most patches soak in a publicly visible queue for
2+ weeks. So will we say 2 weeks min?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> @pjakma Key ID:
64A2FF6A
Fortune:
As you grow older, you will still do foolish things, but you will
do them
with much more enthusiasm.
-- The Cowboy
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
