Paul -

Why don't you put together a quick what you want the world to be
document/presentation and we can discuss this issue at the next monthly
meeting.  Seems like something that would better be discussed in person.

donald

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Donald Sharp wrote:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>>
>> Internally.  I was just extending it to quagga-dev.  I think
>> 'Signed-off-by' has a valid meaning in that we are certifying a chain of
>> ownership for licensing purposes, which is not unreasonable.
>>
>
> There is clear confusion about its significance and use in the open-source
> world. That makes it very weak. Worse, even the use documented above (the
> "DCO") gives it overloaded and hence ambiguous meaning.
>
> Indeed, if there are people using "signed off by" to indicate additional
> authors, that's really bad. Cause SOB doesn't indicate that.
>
> I used to just ignore it, but if that's how some are using it then that
> would shift my position from just ignoring it to actively rejecting patches
> for having it.
>
> * If you want to indicate additional authors, "signed-off-by" does not
> achieve that. You need to unambiguously declare the additional authors (and
> all other interess).
>
> * If you want to indicate or document copyright claims, you (and everyone
> else) would be much better off if you add the well-recognised:
>
>  "Copyright (C) <Year> <Name of entity/person>, [<Location/contact
> details>]"
>
> string near the top of the files that that you/the-entity might have a
> copyright interest in. I would *strongly* encourage people to err on
> *adding* those in submissions.
>
> Especially in light of the babel licensing issue that we had earlier this
>> year.
>>
>
> All the licensing requirements were met there, the issue was something
> else.
>
> regards,
> --
> Paul Jakma      [email protected]  @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
> Fortune:
> need to wrap system in aluminum foil to fix problem
>
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to