On 11 Jan 2017, at 16:24, Paul Jakma wrote:
Hi Martin,
I removed you.
I'd be glad to talk further on transparency with you.
I think it would be beneficial for everyone to have a open discussion on
who should be on the list
or not.
I don’t like to have this discussion in privacy - this isn’t about
me. Maybe I did something stupid
or you (or community?) decided on new rules for who should be on it. I
think it would be beneficial
to everyone to have make it public on who is on the list and probably
why they are on the list (so
it makes somehow the selection more transparent.
BTW: It seems it was some larger “cleanup” as more people got
removed as well. Not just me.
So please, can you share your thoughts publicly?
Regards,
- Martin
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Martin Winter wrote:
For the ones here who are unaware:
There is a security list (secur...@quagga.net) which deals with
security issues reported to Quagga: Assessing them, fixing them,
provide the much needed disclosures etc. This is a closed list which
had mostly “maintainers” and a few other selected individuals on
it.
As part of our testing, I used to be on this list as well - until
yesterday when I was taken off without explanation.
Not blaming anyone, but I was surprised on it - and wanted to get a
public discussion on who is on the list and that I might no longer be
able to test security fixes in private as part of this.
So who is still on the list? Or did the list get deleted? Or what
happened?
Regards,
- Martin Winter
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
--
Paul Jakma | p...@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
A university faculty is 500 egotists with a common parking problem.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
