Eddie,

The seal isn't a standard boot seal, as the lip is too thick. I found
a supplier that does a similar seal, for a thicker lip. Should be able
to forward the details if necessary, although he said at the time that
he didn't have much left.

However, after further thought, I offer the following for
consideration.

1) My car doesn't have a second seal between the lip and the bodywork,
so the 'boot seal' is the only seal against water ingress. My old
Porsche 924 had a second seal between the roof and the lip. I've been
looking at how I could do something similar for the reasons below. The
following assumes that my car is as it left the factory, and doesn't
have anything missing.

2) At present any rain falling on the sunroof panel itself runs off
the edge and into the channel around it. The drain holes are only 5mm
or so, and in heavy rain the channel tends to fill. With a second seal
the only water in the channel is that which has leaked past it. The
rest goes over it and off the side of the roof.

3) Water tends to follow the lip round to the seal, rather than drip
off it. This isn't so much of an issue with a boot or hatchback
because of the angle of the panel. In most places, gravity stops this
happening. As the sunroof is flat, the seal has to be perfect to stop
it getting past. So it's very vulnerable to dirt or tears. This effect
is much worse if the channel fills due to blocked drain holes or
really heavy rain.

4) The metal section of the 'boot seal' means that it is difficult to
join perfectly. On a boot or hatchback the join is generally at the
bottom, where the water would have to go up the back of the panel to
get past it, so it doesn't matter. On the sunroof, it's in the
channel, so it does. An all-rubber seal that can be joined properly
with superglue would not have that problem.

5) I would imagine that the second seal would reduce wind noise too,
by getting rid of the panel gap. As an additional thought, you may
need to put some type of flip-up deflector at the front, to avoid
booming when the panel is removed. I haven't tried it with the Mk1,
but it was unbearable in the Porsche if you pulled the deflector down
at speed. My Mk1 has extra vents in the rear wings, done as an after-
market modification by Quantum themselves. I wonder if they are
connected to that issue?

I've been looking at rubber extrusions to create a second seal for my
car, but it's low on the priority list at the moment. If I sort
anything out, I'll send you the details. I would recommend a look at
one of the early Porsches, though. Once I had replaced the seals, it
was a good design and caused no problems at all.

Finally, my hinges have "L" shaped removeable pins, so that the roof
is removeable. They look to have been made from 1/8" welding rods.
Before it hits the road, they will be replaced with "P" shaped items -
the thought of getting the end of one of them in my eye in an accident
doesn't really appeal.....!

The above isn't intended as any sort of criticism of anyone. I've
never designed a car! I just hope it's food for thought in the early
part of the design process.

Dave.


On 27 Sep, 19:30, Eddie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok guys let's clear this up a little :-)
>
> I have now got a mould for the Mk2 roof. This will enable me to infill
> for anyone who has problems with thier sun roof leaking. Obviously if
> anyone wishes to install a new sun roof, it is unlikely that they will
> find another exactly the same size. At least now I am able to close
> the gap ready to be re cut to suit the new sun roof or if desired,
> leave it re filled ready to paint without any sun roof.
>
> I will in due corse be moulding the Mk1 hatchback sun roof and
> transfering it into the Mk2 roof. I am aware that this is not a
> straight foward task as the sun roof on the Mk1 is wider than the Mk2
> will alow, so much modification willbe required. Eventually I will end
> up with a moulding that wil alow the Mk1 type roof to be contructed
> and fitted to the Mk2.
>
> Please note this is what I want in my cars and thus offer it to all
> other owners. There is advantages to the Mk1 roof as the boot seal
> that sits under the solid fiberglass sun roof is out of veiw to the UV
> of the sun and thus will last much longer than glass sun roof seals. I
> to am not totally taken with how the Mk1 roof was attached to the body
> and will be addressing this in due course.
>
> I understand that not everyone will want to continue to modify their
> car, but it is always nice to have the option.
> Chris, I recon I will only loose an inch and a half in height to the
> roof inside.
>
> Regarding the inside of these cars, I feel that quite an big update is
> now required. This again is on the cards, but first, I wish to sort
> the outside as it would be really good NOT to win worst of show two
> years running :-)
>
> Eddie
>
> On 27 Sep, 15:24, Jim Hearne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >   Normally the Mk1 Quantum saloon is the hatchback (as it actually had a
> > hatchback) and the Mk2 Saloon is the saloon (as it had a boot with a
> > fixed rear window).
> > Eddie is talking about the Mk2 Saloon roof I'm sure.
> > I thought you have a Mk2 as you were talking about bonding in the rear
> > glass, the Mk1 doesn't use bonded glass.
>
> > Jim
>
> > On 27/09/2010 13:05, Dave the Subbie wrote:
>
> > > Hi Eddie,
>
> > > When you say Coupe, do you mean the hatchbacks? Mine has problems
> > > around the sunroof area, but I don't think it's worth spending the
> > > money on. I'll do a localised repair with tissue and make good with
> > > filler. For what it's worth, I can't see much point in spending much
> > > money on the early cars, as their value is so low. I note that there's
> > > a really nice one that appears on Ebay/pistonheads etc for 1500-ish
> > > every so often, but never seems to sell.
>
> > > Obviously, the Club's work on 003 is a different case, as I can see
> > > its historic value, and it would be nice to see it exhibited
> > > somewhere. But that's a one off, and I can't really see anyone
> > > seriously paying much more than 600/700 for any of the others, even
> > > in good condition. So the repairs are going to be cost-driven in the
> > > extreme!
>
> > > For what it's worth, the sunroof on my car doesn't look to be a very
> > > good design in any case, using a boot-seal around the lip, with
> > > consequent large gaps between the sunroof panel and the roof edge,
> > > which must be noisy. The clip doesn't look man-enough to hold such a
> > > large panel tight, and the 2-part hinges are a bit domestic. Sorry,
> > > but I'd advise anyone who wanted a sunroof in a saloon to fit an after
> > > market glass one - much cheaper, and easier, probably a better result,
> > > and more sensible in view of the value of the car. In fact, I have a
> > > couple in my loft that they can have if they are serious..!
>
> > > Sorry if I sound a bit negative (OK, very negative), but I'm afraid
> > > that I don't share your optimism, and it seems like a lot of work for
> > > a limited market.
>
> > > Now, a nice-looking dash moulding to replace the XR2 item, a bit like
> > > the one in my 2+2, but maybe a bit prettier. I could see a small, but
> > > useful market for that??
>
> > > Dave.
>
> > > On 27 Sep, 08:52, Eddie<[email protected]>  wrote:
> > >> Hi all
>
> > >> I now have a mould for the Coupe Roof, so if anyone needs a leaking
> > >> sun roof removed, I now can insert bodywork in place.
>
> > >> In due course I will be attempting to transfer the mk 1 sun roof
> > >> system to the mk 2
> > >> this will take a while, but is planned
>
> > >> Eddie- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).

Reply via email to