Hi Dave now you are thinking along my lines.
I can inform you that if you drive a mk1 without it's roof, there is no problem. I do agree with you about the seal. A boot seal is preferable because of it's easy replacement. To do this, a redesign of the lip that the seal mounts on is essential. The drain holes will be enlarged also compared to the mk1 drain holes that are prone to clogging up with dirt. However it is possible to change the angle of the drain Chanel as well. If this is done, it should be possible to get a "D" type seal around the edge of the sun roof so that the amount of water entering the Chanel will be substantialy reduced, much in the same way as the H4 is done. Talking of the H4, the hinges from the targa roof would be ideal, again I totally agree with you that the mk1 way of hinging looks rather suspect. What I hope to achive is a sun roof that will be easy to use, ad quick to replace the seals with parts easily available over the counter. What I hope to achive is a new sun roof that is in keeping with the original Quantum way of doing things. Hopefully, I might have one working by Stoneligh next year, if I have time. On 29 Sep, 12:46, Dave the Subbie <[email protected]> wrote: > Eddie, > > The seal isn't a standard boot seal, as the lip is too thick. I found > a supplier that does a similar seal, for a thicker lip. Should be able > to forward the details if necessary, although he said at the time that > he didn't have much left. > > However, after further thought, I offer the following for > consideration. > > 1) My car doesn't have a second seal between the lip and the bodywork, > so the 'boot seal' is the only seal against water ingress. My old > Porsche 924 had a second seal between the roof and the lip. I've been > looking at how I could do something similar for the reasons below. The > following assumes that my car is as it left the factory, and doesn't > have anything missing. > > 2) At present any rain falling on the sunroof panel itself runs off > the edge and into the channel around it. The drain holes are only 5mm > or so, and in heavy rain the channel tends to fill. With a second seal > the only water in the channel is that which has leaked past it. The > rest goes over it and off the side of the roof. > > 3) Water tends to follow the lip round to the seal, rather than drip > off it. This isn't so much of an issue with a boot or hatchback > because of the angle of the panel. In most places, gravity stops this > happening. As the sunroof is flat, the seal has to be perfect to stop > it getting past. So it's very vulnerable to dirt or tears. This effect > is much worse if the channel fills due to blocked drain holes or > really heavy rain. > > 4) The metal section of the 'boot seal' means that it is difficult to > join perfectly. On a boot or hatchback the join is generally at the > bottom, where the water would have to go up the back of the panel to > get past it, so it doesn't matter. On the sunroof, it's in the > channel, so it does. An all-rubber seal that can be joined properly > with superglue would not have that problem. > > 5) I would imagine that the second seal would reduce wind noise too, > by getting rid of the panel gap. As an additional thought, you may > need to put some type of flip-up deflector at the front, to avoid > booming when the panel is removed. I haven't tried it with the Mk1, > but it was unbearable in the Porsche if you pulled the deflector down > at speed. My Mk1 has extra vents in the rear wings, done as an after- > market modification by Quantum themselves. I wonder if they are > connected to that issue? > > I've been looking at rubber extrusions to create a second seal for my > car, but it's low on the priority list at the moment. If I sort > anything out, I'll send you the details. I would recommend a look at > one of the early Porsches, though. Once I had replaced the seals, it > was a good design and caused no problems at all. > > Finally, my hinges have "L" shaped removeable pins, so that the roof > is removeable. They look to have been made from 1/8" welding rods. > Before it hits the road, they will be replaced with "P" shaped items - > the thought of getting the end of one of them in my eye in an accident > doesn't really appeal.....! > > The above isn't intended as any sort of criticism of anyone. I've > never designed a car! I just hope it's food for thought in the early > part of the design process. > > Dave. > > On 27 Sep, 19:30, Eddie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ok guys let's clear this up a little :-) > > > I have now got a mould for the Mk2 roof. This will enable me to infill > > for anyone who has problems with thier sun roof leaking. Obviously if > > anyone wishes to install a new sun roof, it is unlikely that they will > > find another exactly the same size. At least now I am able to close > > the gap ready to be re cut to suit the new sun roof or if desired, > > leave it re filled ready to paint without any sun roof. > > > I will in due corse be moulding the Mk1 hatchback sun roof and > > transfering it into the Mk2 roof. I am aware that this is not a > > straight foward task as the sun roof on the Mk1 is wider than the Mk2 > > will alow, so much modification willbe required. Eventually I will end > > up with a moulding that wil alow the Mk1 type roof to be contructed > > and fitted to the Mk2. > > > Please note this is what I want in my cars and thus offer it to all > > other owners. There is advantages to the Mk1 roof as the boot seal > > that sits under the solid fiberglass sun roof is out of veiw to the UV > > of the sun and thus will last much longer than glass sun roof seals. I > > to am not totally taken with how the Mk1 roof was attached to the body > > and will be addressing this in due course. > > > I understand that not everyone will want to continue to modify their > > car, but it is always nice to have the option. > > Chris, I recon I will only loose an inch and a half in height to the > > roof inside. > > > Regarding the inside of these cars, I feel that quite an big update is > > now required. This again is on the cards, but first, I wish to sort > > the outside as it would be really good NOT to win worst of show two > > years running :-) > > > Eddie > > > On 27 Sep, 15:24, Jim Hearne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Normally the Mk1 Quantum saloon is the hatchback (as it actually had a > > > hatchback) and the Mk2 Saloon is the saloon (as it had a boot with a > > > fixed rear window). > > > Eddie is talking about the Mk2 Saloon roof I'm sure. > > > I thought you have a Mk2 as you were talking about bonding in the rear > > > glass, the Mk1 doesn't use bonded glass. > > > > Jim > > > > On 27/09/2010 13:05, Dave the Subbie wrote: > > > > > Hi Eddie, > > > > > When you say Coupe, do you mean the hatchbacks? Mine has problems > > > > around the sunroof area, but I don't think it's worth spending the > > > > money on. I'll do a localised repair with tissue and make good with > > > > filler. For what it's worth, I can't see much point in spending much > > > > money on the early cars, as their value is so low. I note that there's > > > > a really nice one that appears on Ebay/pistonheads etc for 1500-ish > > > > every so often, but never seems to sell. > > > > > Obviously, the Club's work on 003 is a different case, as I can see > > > > its historic value, and it would be nice to see it exhibited > > > > somewhere. But that's a one off, and I can't really see anyone > > > > seriously paying much more than 600/700 for any of the others, even > > > > in good condition. So the repairs are going to be cost-driven in the > > > > extreme! > > > > > For what it's worth, the sunroof on my car doesn't look to be a very > > > > good design in any case, using a boot-seal around the lip, with > > > > consequent large gaps between the sunroof panel and the roof edge, > > > > which must be noisy. The clip doesn't look man-enough to hold such a > > > > large panel tight, and the 2-part hinges are a bit domestic. Sorry, > > > > but I'd advise anyone who wanted a sunroof in a saloon to fit an after > > > > market glass one - much cheaper, and easier, probably a better result, > > > > and more sensible in view of the value of the car. In fact, I have a > > > > couple in my loft that they can have if they are serious..! > > > > > Sorry if I sound a bit negative (OK, very negative), but I'm afraid > > > > that I don't share your optimism, and it seems like a lot of work for > > > > a limited market. > > > > > Now, a nice-looking dash moulding to replace the XR2 item, a bit like > > > > the one in my 2+2, but maybe a bit prettier. I could see a small, but > > > > useful market for that?? > > > > > Dave. > > > > > On 27 Sep, 08:52, Eddie<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi all > > > > >> I now have a mould for the Coupe Roof, so if anyone needs a leaking > > > >> sun roof removed, I now can insert bodywork in place. > > > > >> In due course I will be attempting to transfer the mk 1 sun roof > > > >> system to the mk 2 > > > >> this will take a while, but is planned > > > > >> Eddie- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
