I’ve used both a pressure bleeder (puts pressure in the master cylinder) and a 
vacuum bleeder.
They are easier but you have to be careful or you can flip the seals in the 
master cylinder.
It’s also very messy with the pressure bleeder if it pops off the top of the 
reservoir, brake fluid everywhere, BTDT


Is there a bracket from your servo brackets to the bulkhead ?
It usually goes down to the steering rack bolt.

Also, on the pedal box, there should be a fixing going up vertically from the 
top of the pedal box into the scuttle area (a length off 10mm studding works 
well).

Both of these don’t seem to get fitted to a lot of the Saloons and 2+2’s

Ideally there should be a reinforcing steel plate on the bulkhead around the 
servo bracket fixings , transfer bar fixings and pedal box fixings to stop the 
fibreglass flexing.
I covered the whole bulkhead in the engine bay between the chassis rails with a 
stainless sheet (about 1.5mm i think), bonded on with sikaflex.
Apart from spreading the load it meant that all the original grommets fitted 
properly in the thin sheet. (make the whole in the fibreglass behind a little 
bigger).
As well as plates on the inside of the car.

On my 2+2 i put two 3mm x 25mm stainless straps from the top 2 servo mounts up 
to the chassis rail behind and above the servo.
This made quite a difference.

I also tried boxing in the 2 servo brackets but that didn’t make any difference.

Jim


From: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 9:54 AM
To: Quantum Owners Group 
Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Brakes, jumping to concusions and maths

I've now fitted a 19mm bore master cylinder from on Citroen Saxo and a servo 
from a Mondeo, adjusted sevo to m/cylinder gap and eliminated as much play from 
linkage as I am able. Brake bleeding was a 'mare. After trying several times 
and methods I disconnected the 4 pipes to the m/cylinder and bled just that 
with no problems, I then reconnected and bled each wheel in turn and all was ok 
until I reached the O/SR which  still had bubbles after nearly a litre of fluid 
had been drawn through,   I renewed joints in the pipework as I'd convinced 
myself air was been drawn into the the system somehow, how I have no idea. 
However after remaking joints and renewing pipework which was now too short it 
bled easily and the pedal feels fine. This may not be the end of the story 
however as there is a lot of flex in the m/cylider/servo bracket which needs 
sorting at some point and i'm not sure if the servo i too powerful but i want 
to bed the pads/shoes in and maybe just get used to the feel before deciding if 
that needs attention. 


On Monday, July 27, 2020 at 7:23:24 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:

  Tom

  Google provides a couple of wordings which might be clearer than mine:


  "Fixed calipers have one or more pistons on each side of the disc which each 
apply an equal force to the disc. Sliding calipers have pistons on one side of 
the disc only and rely on Newton’s Third Law to allow an equal reaction on the 
back of the disc by letting the whole housing slide on one or more guide pins. 
Ignoring frictional effects both types will produce similar amounts of total 
clamp force"


  From an online piston area calculator comparing floating in which the total 
number of pistons is used in the calculation - "REMINDER: For floating 
calipers, multiply the result of the calculator by 2".


  It is useful to remember that pedal feel is significantly improved, 
irrespective of cylinder sizes, by replacing floating calipers which are 
literally a "rattling good fit" with fixed calipers which are a more rigid 
system and which in addition typically are made to higher standards (closer 
piston/cylinder fit, stiffer seals, etc). 



  Pedal in mine is right at the top, virtually no softness. Brakes build is in 
here somewhere.



  HTH


  Best regards
  Bill 

  Bill Allison
  Borders Group of Advanced Motorists
  National Observer (Cars)
  07702 739474
  01750 22550 (before 21:00 please)

  www.bgam.org.uk and www.bgam.org.uk/ydi
  www.iamroadsmart.com

  www.facebook.com/BordersAdvancedMotorists



  The contents of this message, and any attachments, may include information 
that is private and confidential and should not be read by persons other than 
the intended addressee(s). IAM RoadSmart nor the sender accepts any 
responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to check the email and 
any attachments. If you have received this email in error, please inform the 
sender and delete the message from your computer. IAM RoadSmart is a trading 
name. IAM RoadSmart is a trademark. Charity number: 249002 (England and Wales) 
SC041201 (Scotland). Registered Address: 1 Albany Place, Hyde Way, Welwyn 
Garden City AL7 3BT. 


  On Monday, 27 July 2020, 17:42:13 BST, Tom Walker <[email protected]> wrote: 


  I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here - I thought by 'reply all' it went to 
the group.  I'll try again - apologies if I've done it again.

  I was querying Bills calculations above (or below - I don't know) because 
even though the pistons are opposed you still need to use the full volume of 
the slave cylinders.

  Tom


  On Monday, 27 July 2020 15:21:27 UTC+1, Jim Hearne wrote:
    Hi Toms,
    Whose maths are you querying ?

    Jim 

    From: Tom Walker 
    Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:12 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Brakes, jumping to conclusions and maths

    Are you sure about the maths there? With the 4-pots you've got a total 
3060mm2 of cylinder per wheel (regardless of which side of the disk they are 
on) vs 1810mm2 for the original calipers - which is about 40% more piston per 
wheel.  So for a given pressure of fluid pushed (N/mm2) from the master 
cylinder, the slaves will exert 40% more pressure (F2=F1xA2/A1) but your foot 
will have to move 40% further (F1d1=F2d2). 

    If you can live with the pedal travel, then for the same leg work you will 
be applying 40% more pressure to the disks.   Add to this the fact that with 
the four pots you have that pressure over a slightly larger pad area, and of 
more significance at a greater distance from the axis giving greater braking 
torque - the braking efficiency increase will be more than the simple 40% 
calculation.

    If you fit a bigger master cylinder (for argument's sake let's say you find 
a cylinder which is 40% bigger) then you will negate the need to push the pedal 
so far, but at the expense of physical effort as the pedal pressure will need 
to be higher.

    As it happens I've got the HiSpec 4-pots on my 2+2 but with 305mm rotors 
(you need 16" wheels).  On the back it's the Fiesta Centre rear-disk conversion 
(I think they are Escort disks with a Granada caliper, but I may be wrong). 
Under the foot it's got an adjustable front/rear brake bias pedal box with 
0.75" pistons for both front and back and most recently, about 4 years ago, I 
fitted a remote vacuum assistance unit (designed for Robin Reliants - I 
think?!?) but to be honest for various family reasons, I've not driven it yet, 
so I can't tell whether it's brilliant or a death-trap. I can tell you it's 
really really really dusty.

    Tom


    On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 09:37, Jim Hearne <[email protected]> wrote:

      I’m afraid it looks like my calculations disappeared in one of my PC 
upgrades.

      I know on my final setup i drilled a new hole in the brake pedal further 
up from the existing XR2 one.
      I think that was to give me more pressure in the brake system at the 
expense of a bit more brake travel.

      As Bill says, you need to upgrade or replace all the bushes and pins in 
the linkage.
      You can also make sure that the pushrod in the servo is adjusted 
correctly so that there is no play between it and the piston in the master 
cylinder.
      Most people don’t know that is adjustable.
      Be careful though, the pistons in the master cylinder have to return to 
the full idle position to allow any pressure in the system to fully disappear 
when you release the pedal.
      If you leave pressure on the pistons in the master cylinder via the servo 
then when the brakes get hot the expanding brake fluid has no where to go and 
gradually holds the brakes on, BTDT

      Jim


      From: russ price 
      Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 9:18 AM
      To: Quantum Owners Group 
      Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Brakes, jumping to conclusions and maths

      Thanks Bill your reply certainly does help. I have fitted braided braided 
lines but the linkage could do with a bit work. So all i need to do now is find 
a servo + mastercylinder the same dimensions or as close to the Fiesta items as 
possible, there is plenty of room and fabrication of the servo tower/bracket if 
it needs changing should not be problematic. That is of course unless someone 
has a mk2 servo they want to sell.

      On Monday, July 27, 2020 at 8:36:46 AM UTC+1, Bill Allison wrote: 
        Hi Russ

        I hope these comments will be useful:

        Your standard setup: Caliper piston area 
            2 x 1810mm2 = 3620mm2

        Hi-Spec setup: Pair of twin piston calipers (a pair of opposing pistons 
exerts the same clamping force as a sliding caliper with a single piston)

            4 x 765mm2 = 3060mm2

        Difference = (3620-3060)/3620 = 85%


        So on the face of it you need a 15% smaller (area-wise) than standard 
master cylinder to get the same braking effort, BUT, you need also to take 
account of the increase in leverage due to the larger discs: 265/225 (the 
effective diameters) implies a 17.5% increase (area-wise) in m/cyl size.

        The two as near as dammit cancel out, so you actually need to not 
change master cylinder size!

        I have not incorporated rear slave cylinder size in the calcs because 
the rear pressure limiting valve takes them out of the equation at quite low 
pedal pressures. 

        I hope that helps.

        Regarding pedal feel, it's pretty much essential to replace the rubber 
flexible hoses front and rear with braided teflon lines, I found also that 
pedal feel can be further transformed by removing play at every point in the 
longish route from your foot to the master cylinder, including setting the 
m/cyl pushrod clearance.


        Best regards
        Bill 

        Bill Allison
        Borders Group of Advanced Motorists
        National Observer (Cars)
        07702 739474
        01750 22550 (before 21:00 please)

        www.bgam.org.uk and www.bgam.org.uk/ydi
        www.iamroadsmart.com

        www.facebook.com/ BordersAdvancedMotorists



        The contents of this message, and any attachments, may include 
information that is private and confidential and should not be read by persons 
other than the intended addressee(s). IAM RoadSmart nor the sender accepts any 
responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to check the email and 
any attachments. If you have received this email in error, please inform the 
sender and delete the message from your computer. IAM RoadSmart is a trading 
name. IAM RoadSmart is a trademark. Charity number: 249002 (England and Wales) 
SC041201 (Scotland). Registered Address: 1 Albany Place, Hyde Way, Welwyn 
Garden City AL7 3BT. 




        On Sunday, 26 July 2020, 10:54:37 BST, russ price <[email protected]> 
wrote: 


        After fitting Hispec 4 pot calipers and 280mm discs i thought i should 
do something about a probable leak from the master cylinder, the clue being 
rust and bubling paint on the servo. The trouble began when i sheared off a 
stud holding the m'cylinder to the servo, no problem i thought i have a Mondeo 
m'cylinder/servo which i have heard is used as an upgrade and a bigger 
m'cylinder is probably a good idea after going from 2 to 8 pistons on the 
front. This i now believe was an olympic standard jump to the wrong conclusion.
        If i have done the maths right, ( I would be grateful if someone 
checked my results) i need to go down in m'cylinder bore size. Now i know 
calculations of braking forces are really complex but this just about the 
"feel" of the brakes.
        Here are the figures i used, original calpers single 48mm piston, new 
calipers four 31.2 mm pistons, rear slave cylinder 17.5mm, original m,cylinder 
20.6mm, mondeo m'cylinder 25.4
        Which give an original set up m'cylinder/caliper ratio ~ 1:23, original 
m'cylinder + new calipers ~ 1:20, mondeo m'cylinder + new caliper ~ 1:13
        So given Fiesta mk2 servo's are not exactly thick on the ground i 
thought about a set up similar to that recently used on 003, ie. landrover 
servo + Mk1 19mm m'cylinder  which should give me a ratio ~ 1:23
        I would really appreciate it if anyone can say to me " Your are talking 
nonsense and here's why......" or " Yes that should work but be aware of 
......."

        -- 
        -- 
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
        To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
        To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
quantumowner...@googlegroups. com
        For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
group/quantumowners?hl=en
         
        IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an 
"As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum 
Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in 
the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person 
or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
        --- 
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to [email protected].
        To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ 
msgid/quantumowners/5e0fda55- 6bbe-41f8-9fb4-400ad2881832o% 40googlegroups.com.

      -- 
      -- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
      To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

      To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscribe@ 
googlegroups.com

      For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
group/quantumowners?hl=en
       
      IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As 
Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum 
Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in 
the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person 
or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
      --- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.

      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to quantumowners+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
      To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ 
msgid/quantumowners/5623fde2- 4cea-4541-8f7e-1130aa49bfc1o% 40googlegroups.com.

      -- 
      -- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
      To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

      To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscribe@ 
googlegroups.com

      For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
group/quantumowners?hl=en
       
      IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As 
Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum 
Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in 
the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person 
or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
      --- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.

      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to quantumowners+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
      To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ 
msgid/quantumowners/ BFF5A83EAE124030BEC84565F3C63E D7%40JimQuad. 

    -- 
    -- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowner...@ 
googlegroups.com
    For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
group/quantumowners?hl=en
     
    IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As 
Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum 
Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in 
the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person 
or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
    --- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.

    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to quantumowners+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ 
msgid/quantumowners/ CADjwJF7tc% 2B4YgmtB6iRvith1pxgFcypkTiDaZm 
9z%3DuzW6Z3H0Q%40mail.gmail. com.

  -- 
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
  For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
   
  IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.

  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].

  To view this discussion on the web visit 
  
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/521aa4ad-1a50-4cae-8f21-dfd926863960o%40googlegroups.com
 
  .

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
 
IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/b28a2d14-9b2c-4055-a14e-8a427b869611n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/C20387E15D5F43A09A24B72A5B12540A%40JimQuad.

Reply via email to