> Ok, I have to admit I'm confused about "copied macros are clones". This is > what happens with copy and paste already, no? Do you mean that Virtual > Patches should all be distinct and editable in each qtz without changing the > original virtual patch?
I think what he means is this: You create Macro Foo. You then copy/paste it (so you have 2 Foos). If you edit _either_ Foo, _both_ are modified (so in essence, they're the "same" thing, instantiated in 2 places). Currently, if you modify a macro that has copies (Not a virtual macro), you modify that instance only. (if that's not the intent, please set us straight :) -- Christopher Wright [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
