I just noticed that if a composition drops frames between moving values "super fast" the logic can be tricked. Maybe more frames could be sampled. I'm interested in anyone else's thoughts as well.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:44 AM, George Toledo <gtole...@gmail.com> wrote: > You'll find that the smooth will work perfectly as long as you don't > "scrub" between values. It's trying to smooth along each step....Try > monitoring change of value, and don't sample when the last two frames are > different. > > Check the attachment for a solution. > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Ali Demirel <ka...@xurban.net> wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> I'm working on a basic puzzle in QC, may be somebody can come up with a >> simple smart solution... >> >> I'm trying to control the period of this sphere's diameter live: >> >> >> >> I'm trying to eliminate the jump in the diameter value when I change the >> period of the LFO. >> >> We tried the smooth patch but it doesn't do the job perfect: >> >> >> >> Any alternative solution ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> Ali Demirel >> ali-d.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> >> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/gtoledo3%40gmail.com >> >> This email sent to gtole...@gmail.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
