> Idea proposal:
>
> ===============
>
> During writing I had an idea. An improved way to handle such use case could 
> be the concept of PC (OS or Qubes) state (I hadn't time to find a suitable 
> name, lol). I mean: when you are in a state only a subset of VMs are present, 
> the other ones are deleted (according the definition of deleted of a 
> non-volatile support..). When you restore to another state (it could be also 
> a "full state") a paranoid restore is done, by default. In this way users are 
> forced to restore, so they know the risk. The key is that this state isn't 
> related to a VMs group, instead it's related to your entire system.
>
Furthermore the user is not constrained to remember any password (in your 
approach each VMs domain has one password).


Best Regards,
Raffaele.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-devel@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/EqzL1JLyU0AcCb4ql-3kZIWa2KFyUGo477WMZV0zwa2JNS2JiFxoH9oGlso5t3jZTR7PhzJsr6Ri6Iy-ClYnRYK-eu5Y-9_xgjK-2khSFf8%3D%40protonmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to