On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:44:24PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > > That's easy to say Andy, but have you any proof? Qubes is an Open > Source project so why not open up the qubes accounts and let the users > see some factual information. Surely, there can't be anything to hide?
What would be the point of opening up "the qubes accounts"? Let's return to your initial questions regarding Librem 13 not getting certified. Andrew addressed your concerns and explained what happened with the collaboration process between Librem and Qubes, and why. Do you have any reason to believe anyone is lying? It looks to me that neither Qubes or Librem made any promises to anyone, and that you might have read the *partnership announcement* post as if the certification was a fact. They decided to not proceed with the certification, end of story. -- noor |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Noor Christensen |O|O|O| [email protected] ~ 0x401DA1E0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20170713150106.axbqd5a77flkxa3b%40mail. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
