David Woolley <[email protected]> writes: >David L. Mills wrote:
>> mitigation algorithms, generally three candidates. If a reference clock >> is among them, only its leap bits are used. If not, a vote is taken >Surely that needs to be limited to reference clocks that are definitely >capable of reporting leap seconds without manual intervention, and >considering the hardware, as well as the driver. It also seems to be wrong for 4.2.4p4. I have an shm PPS source, which certainly does not report leap seconds. But my system is reporting that it is leap second ready and that could only have come from its other two servers, which are not refclock drivers, but standard network servers. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
