In article <[email protected]>,
Richard B. Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
>David L. Mills wrote:
>> More specifically, for those survivors that show leap warnings, a
>> counter is incremented. If any survivoe, referencde clock or not, does
>> not show warning the ocunter is not incremented. For refclocks the
>> counter is set to the number of survivors, but only if the warning is
>> lit. After this, if the counter is greater than half the number of
>> survivors, the system leap warning is lit. You are welcdome to suggest
>> an alternative method on the basis that some refclocks do not implement
>> the leap warning and others may show a warning in error.
>
>How about a leap minute every 240 years or so?
How would that address the issue?
Or are you saying in 240 years you won't be around to care :-)
--
-- Rod --
rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
