Unruh wrote: > David Woolley <[email protected]> writes: > >>David L. Mills wrote: > >>> mitigation algorithms, generally three candidates. If a reference clock >>> is among them, only its leap bits are used. If not, a vote is taken > >>Surely that needs to be limited to reference clocks that are definitely >>capable of reporting leap seconds without manual intervention, and >>considering the hardware, as well as the driver. > > It also seems to be wrong for 4.2.4p4. I have an shm PPS source, which > certainly does not report leap seconds. But my system is reporting that it > is leap second ready and that could only have come from its other two > servers, which are not refclock drivers, but standard network servers.
Again, what Dave has pointed out refers only to the dev version. 4.2.4p4 is a stable version which behaves differently. Martin -- Martin Burnicki Meinberg Funkuhren Bad Pyrmont Germany _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
