"Miernik, Jerzy (Jerzy)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Unruh and Terje, thank you for replying.
> What if we complicated networking somewhat, such that at times > node50 acquires GPS capability while node1 may looses it? Actually, > to make the problem general, any one node (possibly only one) may > have GPS and remain at an extremity of the network, where indeed the > traffic between 'outer' nodes must be routed through all other 48 > nodes forming a chain of 49 hops. So, sometimes node2 may have GPS > too, like this: > Node2 --- node3 --- node1 --- node4 --- .... --- node49 --- node50 > GPS Just what sort of mobile/ad-hoc/point-to-point network where nodes end-up in the GPS shadow of tall buildings might this be? rick jones -- Process shall set you free from the need for rational thought. these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
