Miernik, Jerzy (Jerzy) wrote: > What if we complicated networking somewhat, > such that at times node50 acquires GPS capability > while node1 may looses it? Actually, to make the > problem general, any one node (possibly only one) > may have GPS and remain at an extremity of the network, > where indeed the traffic between 'outer' nodes must be > routed through all other 48 nodes forming a chain of 49 > hops. So, sometimes node2 may have GPS too, like this: > > Node2 - node3 - node1 - node4 - ... - node49 - node50 > GPS > > Or nodes node1, node2, node3, node4 have GPS in some > kind of a 'normal' network of four, with a long tail > (like in a kite) of 46 nodes attached to one of the four.
Ad-hoc wireless mesh network? As long as they are all _your_ nodes on _your_ network, and you have bandwidth to waste; Config every node, with all the nodes? increase maxclock (lots), use cohort, and orphan? -- E-Mail Sent to this address <[email protected]> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
