Richard B. Gilbert wrote: > What "article" are you talking about? If it was posted here, > could you tell me the date/time stamp on the message?
(Shrug) <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/msg/ac4e5ac7682ba4a7> From: Stephen Vaughan <[email protected]> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp Subject: Re: Local clock - sync issue Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:24:10 GMT Message-ID: <[email protected]> See Link: <http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/15345.html> <BlockQuote> The solution is to make NTP more persistent when probing the remote time server. This is done by appending the flags burst and iburst to the remote server; burst tells NTP to send a burst of eight packets to the remote server instead of one when the server is reachable, and iburst tells it to do the same when the server is not reachable. The result is faster and more reliable synchronizations. </BlockQuote> Stephen Vaughan would likely benefit from "iburst"; However if Stephen Vaughan turns on "burst", his NTP clients may be treated as a source of abuse. -- E-Mail Sent to this address <[email protected]> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
