Steve Kostecke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-09-07, Seth Seeger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If I understand it correctly, the LOCAL hack just means that the >> server (10.1.3.2) will hand out the time, even if it itself hasn't >> been sync'd. This is perfect, since really what I care about is >> perfect time between the server and rds1 and rds2. > > Without a real time reference your server clock is "freewheeling" and > most likely not ticking at a stable or fixed rate. So rds[12] are > continually converging on a moving target.
This is exactly what some people need. Same time between different servers in the network, don't care if it is UTC or not. When it is not your requirement, fine. But stop suggesting others it is no good. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
