On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Brian Inglis < brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote:
> While 1ns precision may be doable, accuracy depends on what > controls the GM, and its traceability to a reference. > Sure. My point is I haven't seen a use case in this thread for nanosecond *accuracy* relative to the TAI paper clock. Actually I haven't seen a use case for anything -- just some wishful thinking. Getting and keeping a GM in (sub)nanosecond phase with any national lab would appear to be a much larger problem than worrying about which lab you decide to use as a label on the side of the box. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
