On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Rob <nom...@example.com> wrote: > Paul <tik-...@bodosom.net> wrote: > > Sure. My point is I haven't seen a use case in this thread for > nanosecond > > *accuracy* relative to the TAI paper clock. > > It is not for timestamping the moment of clicking in an online auction > or stock trade? >
The original question was about the capability of PTP as an improvement over NTP possibly based on IRIG time transfer. Given such a vague question one might simply say if you spend enough money you can do better than the noted O(1ms). Eventually *this* thread drifted off the rails into the realm of national lab scale transfers. Since Joe Gwinn didn't say there was a need for such a degree of *fidelity* (truth as opposed to precision or accuracy, I should have made that more clear) I don't yet know why the issue came up. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
