Hi, On 2021-4-21, at 16:57, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > And that was apparently enough to cause the chairs to go ballistic. It > was not polite whatsoever. It was a first class snarl.
the message that was sent said: "This thread is not discussing a QUIC-specific issue. There are more appropriate venues to discuss the merits of TLS, DANE and PKIs. Please take it there." I'm struggling to interpret those three sentences as "going ballistic", or being a "first class snarl". With all due respect, I think you are overreacting. Thanks, Lars (also one of the chairs)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
