On 4/21/21 7:16 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
On 2021-4-21, at 16:57, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
And that was apparently enough to cause the chairs to go ballistic. It
was not polite whatsoever. It was a first class snarl.
the message that was sent said: "This thread is not discussing a QUIC-specific
issue. There are more appropriate venues to discuss the merits of TLS, DANE and PKIs.
Please take it there."
I'm struggling to interpret those three sentences as "going ballistic", or being a
"first class snarl". With all due respect, I think you are overreacting.
I am a newcomer. I came here against my better judgement as I stated on
the IETF list. I immediately had my head chopped off and told to go away
by a working group chair in less than 24 hours. If the number of packets
exchanged in the initial handshake of a transport protocol is off topic,
I am speechless. My better judgement wasn't that it was off topic, it
was that this outcome is the ordinary behavior of insular IETF working
groups.
I also got told that signing a zone is tantamount to "boiling the
ocean". As IETF chair, do you agree with that? Because if it's true then
there are serious issues with DNSSec and we should do something about
it. I think it's nonsense, fwiw.
Mike, and what exactly are those venues? tia.
