I support adoption.

Thanks,
- Nick Banks


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>

________________________________
From: QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Christian Huitema 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 2:09 PM
To: David Schinazi <[email protected]>; Matt Joras <[email protected]>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Call For Adoption: quic-v2

I support adoption.

-- Christian Huitema

On 11/12/2021 10:44 AM, David Schinazi wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. I support adoption.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:28 AM Matt Joras <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Good question. This call only applies to the scope of the existing
>> document, i.e. an "identical" version to v1 (where that definition may
>> change slightly but will not grow beyond something reasonable) for the
>> purposes of exercising having multiple defined versions of QUIC.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt Joras
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:51 AM David Schinazi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> Clarifying question: what does this adoption call entail?
>>> Does it mean that we decide that QUICv2 has the narrow
>>> scope of the current individual draft, or does it only mean
>>> that the WG wants to work on QUICv2 and that the scope
>>> will be decided later?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:28 AM Matt Joras <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> As discussed at the WG meeting, this draft[1] provides an "identical"
>>>> version of QUIC under a new version alias. The chairs believe it is an
>>>> opportune time to propose adoption, and this email serves as that
>>>> call. We believe this to be useful work for the working group to take
>>>> on, especially in the context of the already-adopted and ongoing
>>>> version negotiation work[2]. Please reply to this email with any
>>>> comments. The call will run through November 19th.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt & Lucas
>>>> QUIC Chairs
>>>>
>>>> [1] 
>>>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-duke-quic-v2%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7C7d4f0811b5e54657a9cb08d9a610112b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637723410966356599%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=9r3%2FtlGGQLk%2Fn%2BoBY3GA29pT7iP4sdn8jqV4IGHqc8Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> [2]
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7C7d4f0811b5e54657a9cb08d9a610112b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637723410966356599%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=EswQSq%2FJJicnTL1AIMDWpFZZXn38lROO%2BZCTtEYnCs4%3D&amp;reserved=0

Reply via email to