Thank you all for your input. The Chairs believe there is significant support to adopt this document with the limited scope as discussed above. That is, the current scope of the draft with room for limited sensible modifications. This is not a featureful version of QUIC.
Matt & Lucas QUIC Chairs On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:43 AM Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 15, 2021, at 19:24, Kazuho Oku <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2021年11月15日(月) 9:02 Martin Thomson <[email protected]>: > > Adopt it. The scope as stated by Matt and Marten is where I'd like to see > > this stay. > > > > +1. > > +1 > > spt > > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021, at 04:28, Matt Joras wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > As discussed at the WG meeting, this draft[1] provides an "identical" > > > version of QUIC under a new version alias. The chairs believe it is an > > > opportune time to propose adoption, and this email serves as that > > > call. We believe this to be useful work for the working group to take > > > on, especially in the context of the already-adopted and ongoing > > > version negotiation work[2]. Please reply to this email with any > > > comments. The call will run through November 19th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matt & Lucas > > > QUIC Chairs > > > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-quic-v2/ > > > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation/ >
