2021年11月15日(月) 9:02 Martin Thomson <[email protected]>: > Adopt it. The scope as stated by Matt and Marten is where I'd like to see > this stay. >
+1. > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021, at 04:28, Matt Joras wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > As discussed at the WG meeting, this draft[1] provides an "identical" > > version of QUIC under a new version alias. The chairs believe it is an > > opportune time to propose adoption, and this email serves as that > > call. We believe this to be useful work for the working group to take > > on, especially in the context of the already-adopted and ongoing > > version negotiation work[2]. Please reply to this email with any > > comments. The call will run through November 19th. > > > > Thanks, > > Matt & Lucas > > QUIC Chairs > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-quic-v2/ > > [2] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation/ > > -- Kazuho Oku
